<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>scottpiro.com &#187; Watson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottpiro.com/tag/watson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottpiro.com</link>
	<description>social media, copywriting, public relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Freaked Out by The Singularity?</title>
		<link>http://scottpiro.com/2011/05/freaked-out-by-the-singularity/</link>
		<comments>http://scottpiro.com/2011/05/freaked-out-by-the-singularity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 10:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Piro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.I.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeopardy!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lev Grossman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kurzweil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/scottpiro/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When last week&#8217;s TIME arrived, I expected Egypt to be on the cover.  And it was &#8211; but not as the cover story.  TIME had some cockamamie a headline front &#38; center stating &#8211; 2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal &#8211; next to a Matrix-like image of a humanoid w/ a cable sticking out its [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When last week&#8217;s TIME arrived, I expected Egypt to be on the cover.  And it was &#8211; but not as the cover story.  TIME had <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">some cockamamie</span> a headline front &amp; center stating &#8211; <em><a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2048138,00.html" target="_blank">2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal</a></em> &#8211; next to a Matrix-like image of a humanoid w/ a cable sticking out its neck.  (<em>Really, TIME? </em>I asked myself.  I know it&#8217;s difficult to sell magazine copies in the age of Twitter links, and having the first in-depth story on a buzzy, non-mainstream topic could help differentiate TIME and drive sales, but a &#8216;real life Matrix&#8217; story &#8211; <em>really, TIME??</em>)</p>
<p>But it was authored by one of my favorite contemporary writers, <a href="http://levgrossman.com/blog/" target="_blank">Lev Grossman</a>, whose technology/culture profiles for TIME I usually enjoy.  So, I took it to the dogpark and read it straight away.</p>
<p>And promptly had my mind blown.  &#8217;The Singularity&#8217; is an event predicted to arrive within the next thirty-five years, where computers become so fast they give rise to consciousness.  &#8221;Shortly after, the human era will be ended,&#8221; a source in the article says.  The story provides many reasons why this would be wonderful &#8211; for example, extending life indefinitely by rewriting the human genome, or cheating death instead by <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">becoming cyborgs</span> having our consciousnesses &#8216;scanned&#8217; into computers and &#8216;living forever as software.&#8217;  But it also mentions how &#8220;introducing a superior life-form into your own biosphere is a basic Darwinian error.&#8221;  That&#8217;s the part that scares me.  Even though there are newly formed organizations dedicated to ensuring &#8216;Strong Artificial Intelligence&#8217; is friendly, and they are staffed with the best brains on the subject&#8230;if these new sentient computers are billions of times smarter than all of humanity put together, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">how can we possibly establish adequate safeguards that won&#8217;t be out-maneuvered</span>??  That seems like 180proof oxymorondom.</p>
<p>Somewhere deep inside (at the species level), I also have a wounded ego from the idea of humankind no longer being atop the food chain.  If there emerges a new race of superthinking computers doing all the really important work&#8230;.how will our lives continue to matter?</p>
<p>Look, the poster boy for The Singularity, <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/" target="_blank">Ray Kurzweil</a>, comes off as very sane and likable in the article.  I&#8217;m reassured by the fact that he feels nothing but excitement for The Singularity.  But those two points I cited above leave me a little nervous still.  It didn&#8217;t help that IBM&#8217;s &#8217;question answering machine&#8217; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html" target="_blank">Watson wiped the floor with <em>Jeopardy!</em> champ Ken Jennings</a> a few days after I read the TIME story.</p>
<p>Anyway, it doesn&#8217;t matter, because I&#8217;m now hooked on the subject.  It feels like we&#8217;re hurtling to an inevitable, monumental change akin to the the apes in Kubrick&#8217;s 2001: A Space Odyssey figuring out they could use those bones as weapons.  The <em>Final Jeopardy! </em>question is: <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What is: <strong>exciting</strong></span>?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottpiro.com/2011/05/freaked-out-by-the-singularity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
